GAUTAMCHAND @ GAUTAMCHANDRA S/O BHAGCHAND NENULAL KHATIK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 84/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH180003302026
Filing Number
84/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
84/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
1-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192060250649
Police Station
VIRAMGAM- RURAL POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAUTAMCHAND @ GAUTAMCHANDRA S/O BHAGCHAND NENULAL KHATIK
Adv. M M PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
-
2.RIZWANKHAN S/O GULABKHAN PATHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge at Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the bail application of Gautamchand, accused of theft of 11 KV electric aluminum wires worth Rs. 47,500 under the Indian Electricity Act and BNS sections. The court held that mere filing of a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail, and given the prima facie case against the applicant, the gravity of the offense, and the risk of crime repetition or witness tampering, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2026
Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge at Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the bail application of Gautamchand, accused of theft of 11 KV electric aluminum wires worth Rs. 47,500 under the Indian Electricity Act and BNS sections. The court held that mere filing of a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail, and given the prima facie case against the applicant, the gravity of the offense, and the risk of crime repetition or witness tampering, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts