VISHNUBHAI MELABHAI THAKOR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 83/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH180003292026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
83/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
1-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192061260124
Police Station
VIRAMGAM- TOWN POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHNUBHAI MELABHAI THAKOR
Adv. U R UPADALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
-
2.SAGARBHAI JASHVANTBHAI PANARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge of Ahmedabad rejected the bail application of Vishnubhai Melabhai Thakor under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant for offences under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 351(2), 352, and 54 of BNS, noting that he allegedly supported the main accused, abused, and assaulted the complainant. The court determined that bail denial was justified due to the serious nature of the offence, ongoing investigation at a crucial stage, risk of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and breach of peace given that both the applicant and victim reside in the same locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2026
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge of Ahmedabad rejected the bail application of Vishnubhai Melabhai Thakor under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant for offences under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 351(2), 352, and 54 of BNS, noting that he allegedly supported the main accused, abused, and assaulted the complainant. The court determined that bail denial was justified due to the serious nature of the offence, ongoing investigation at a crucial stage, risk of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and breach of peace given that both the applicant and victim reside in the same locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts