BHARAT SINH HANUBHA SOLANKI vs MARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED Advocate - U C DAVE — 4/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJAH180003112020

Filing Number

4/2020

Filing Date

02-Mar-2020

Registration No

4/2020

Registration Date

02-Mar-2020

Court

FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

1-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96
Ia/1/2020 Classification : Interlocutory Application Section BHARAT SINH HANUBHA SOLANKIMARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SINH HANUBHA SOLANKI

    Adv. P D BAROT

  2. 2.LATE JASHVATSANG AGARSANG(Legal Heir) 2.

  3. 3.GANPATSANG JASVANTSANG 2.

  4. 4.VILASABA JASVATSANG 2.

  5. 5.LATE HANUBHA JASWANTSANG(Legal Heir) 2.3.

  6. 6.LILABA HANUBHA 2.3.

  7. 7.BALDEVSANG HANUBHA 2.3.

  8. 8.PANVIRSINH HANUBHA

  9. 9.LATE ISWARSANG RAJAJI(Legal Heir) 3.

  10. 10.LATE POPATSANG ISHWARSANG(Legal Heir) 3.1.

  11. 11.VINUBHA POPATSANG 3.1.

  12. 12.AJITSINH POPTSANG 3.1.

  13. 13.VIRENDRASINH POPATSANG 3.1.

  14. 14.GEETABA POPATSANG 3.

  15. 15.ANANDSANG ISHWARSANG 3.

  16. 16.JANAKBA ISHWARSANG 3.

  17. 17.CHANDRABA ISHWARSANG

  18. 18.LATE NATHUSANG BHAVSANG(Legal Heir) 4.

  19. 19.LATE MANIBA NATHUSANG(Legal Heir) 4.1.

  20. 20.GITABA DASHRATHSINH HEIR OF LATE DASHRATHSINH MANSANGJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED Advocate - U C DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Bharat Sinh Hanubha Solanki v. Maruti Suzuki Limited (RCA 4/2020) The appellate court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment rejecting their suit for permanent injunction over land parcels (survey nos. 52, 54/2, 63) in Ahmedabad. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove ownership/possession of the disputed property, which had been legally sold through a chain of registered transactions beginning in 2006 from the Ukardi Mandali cooperative to the defendant. Documentary evidence established the defendant as the lawful owner and possessor, while plaintiffs' claims based on a 1963 mutation entry were barred by limitation and rendered moot by subsequent legal transfers and failed administrative appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  13. 15-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl District Judge

  15. 09-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  19. 23-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  22. 17-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  23. 05-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  24. 11-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  25. 30-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  26. 23-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  27. 28-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  28. 14-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  29. 08-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl District Judge

  30. 29-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl District Judge

  31. 07-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl District Judge

  32. 23-Feb-2024

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl District Judge

  33. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  34. 23-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  35. 15-Jan-2024

    Hearing On Application For Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  36. 28-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Application For Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  37. 30-Oct-2023

    For R&P

    5th Addl District Judge

  38. 15-Sep-2023

    For R&P

    5th Addl District Judge

  39. 10-Aug-2023

    For R&P

    5th Addl District Judge

  40. 14-Jul-2023

    For R&P

    5th Addl District Judge

  41. 15-Jun-2023

    For R&P

    5th Addl District Judge

  42. 04-May-2023

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  43. 20-Mar-2023

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  44. 31-Jan-2023

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  45. 23-Dec-2022

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  46. 17-Nov-2022

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  47. 07-Oct-2022

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  48. 12-Sep-2022

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  49. 02-Aug-2022

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  50. 30-Jun-2022

    For Arguement of Complainant

    4th Addl District Judge

  51. 21-Apr-2022

    Service Of Process

    2nd Addl District Judge

  52. 27-Jan-2022

    Service Of Process

    2nd Addl District Judge

  53. 18-Nov-2021

    Service Of Process

    2nd Addl District Judge

  54. 26-Aug-2021

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  55. 10-Jun-2021

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  56. 02-Mar-2021

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  57. 05-Jan-2021

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  58. 11-Nov-2020

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  59. 22-Oct-2020

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  60. 13-Aug-2020

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  61. 12-Aug-2020

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  62. 17-Jun-2020

    Service Of Process

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  63. 23-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 02-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bharat Sinh Hanubha Solanki v. Maruti Suzuki Limited (RCA 4/2020) The appellate court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment rejecting their suit for permanent injunction over land parcels (survey nos. 52, 54/2, 63) in Ahmedabad. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove ownership/possession of the disputed property, which had been legally sold through a chain of registered transactions beginning in 2006 from the Ukardi Mandali cooperative to the defendant. Documentary evidence established the defendant as the lawful owner and possessor, while plaintiffs' claims based on a 1963 mutation entry were barred by limitation and rendered moot by subsequent legal transfers and failed administrative appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case