Akhil Bhartiya Karmchari Mahasangh vs Pratapsingh — 358/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

REF-ITC - REFERENCE (I.T.C.)

CNR: GJAH170010932025

Filing Number

358/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

358/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

4-Member, Industrial Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akhil Bhartiya Karmchari Mahasangh

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pratapsingh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad dismissed the reference filed by Akhil Bhartiya Karmchari Mahasangh (respondent/union) against Pratap Singh, permitting the union to withdraw its case. The reference, which challenged the Western Railway's transfer of an employee without seniority and on allegations of harassment toward a SC employee, was disposed of with permission to withdraw and no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 358/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad dismissed the reference filed by Akhil Bhartiya Karmchari Mahasangh (respondent/union) against Pratap Singh, permitting the union to withdraw its case. The reference, which challenged the Western Railway's transfer of an employee without seniority and on allegations of harassment toward a SC employee, was disposed of with permission to withdraw and no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case