Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor SanghAhmedabad vs ONGC Ltd. Ahmedabad — 233/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd May 2026.

REF-ITC - REFERENCE (I.T.C.)

CNR: GJAH170009682025

Case disposed

Filing Number

233/2025

Filing Date

18-03-2019

Registration No

233/2025

Registration Date

18-03-2019

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

4-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor SanghAhmedabad

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ONGC Ltd. Ahmedabad

M/S. ONGC Ltd. Ahmedabad

M/S Lion Man Power Solution Pvt. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

02-05-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

For award

03-01-2026

For Notice Serve to both partys

19-11-2025

For Notice Serve to both partys

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The Industrial Tribunal rejected the reference filed by the Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh union seeking compassionate employment for Yuvraj Sinh Zala as a contractual security guard at ONGC Ltd, Ahmedabad. The tribunal found that the second party (union/worker) failed to appear before the tribunal despite multiple opportunities, submitted no written statement, and presented no documentary or oral evidence to substantiate their claim for relief. Consequently, the reference was dismissed as the worker could not prove entitlement to the demanded relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Tribunal rejected the reference filed by the Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh union seeking compassionate employment for Yuvraj Sinh Zala as a contractual security guard at ONGC Ltd, Ahmedabad. The tribunal found that the second party (union/worker) failed to appear before the tribunal despite multiple opportunities, submitted no written statement, and presented no documentary or oral evidence to substantiate their claim for relief. Consequently, the reference was dismissed as the worker could not prove entitlement to the demanded relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case