SHREE VIDHYUT KAMDAR SANGH GANDHINAGAR vs GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD. Advocate - A D TRIVEDI — 9/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 26. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
MISCAPP IT - MISC. APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170006522025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHREE VIDHYUT KAMDAR SANGH GANDHINAGAR
Adv. A N BAROT
Respondent(s)
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD. Advocate - A D TRIVEDI
GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION VADODARA
Adv. A D TRIVEDI
GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION LTD.
Adv. A D TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad allowed the applicant's restoration application under Rule 26(A) of the Industrial Dispute (Gujarat) Rules, setting aside an ex-parte dismissal order dated 09.07.2025 for Reference (IT) No. 107/2023. The tribunal found that the applicant's absence was inadvertent due to pending union discussions, and since the online copy of the award was received on 20.08.2025 with the restoration application filed on 29.08.2025 (within 30 days of knowledge), the application was timely and bonafide. The tribunal prioritized substantial justice on merits over procedural technicalities, ordering restoration of the reference upon deposit of Rs. 500 as cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad allowed the applicant's restoration application under Rule 26(A) of the Industrial Dispute (Gujarat) Rules, setting aside an ex-parte dismissal order dated 09.07.2025 for Reference (IT) No. 107/2023. The tribunal found that the applicant's absence was inadvertent due to pending union discussions, and since the online copy of the award was received on 20.08.2025 with the restoration application filed on 29.08.2025 (within 30 days of knowledge), the application was timely and bonafide. The tribunal prioritized substantial justice on merits over procedural technicalities, ordering restoration of the reference upon deposit of Rs. 500 as cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts