M/S SHIVAM MOTOR BODY BUILDERS vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - S R THAKORE — 65/2014
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 075. Status: For Evidence of opponent. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.
CNR: GJAH170006032014
Filing Number
65/2014
Filing Date
27-Nov-2014
Registration No
65/2014
Registration Date
27-Nov-2014
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-Member, Industrial Court
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SHIVAM MOTOR BODY BUILDERS
Adv. S R VIJAYVARGIY
Respondent(s)
-
1.REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - S R THAKORE
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Apr-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Member, Industrial Court
-
03-Apr-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Feb-2026
Restored
Member, Industrial Court
-
14-Oct-2025
Restored
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Jan-2024
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: APP-ESI-65-2014 Case: M/S Shivam Motor Body Builders v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad Outcome: The petition is DISMISSED. The court upheld the ESI Corporation's assessment demanding Rs. 3,32,287/- in unpaid ESI contributions from the petitioner company. The court found the petitioner failed to adequately contest the assessment, rejected its claims that ESI provisions did not apply, and confirmed the corporation's inspection report and recovery demand as valid and legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2024
Disposed
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Jan-2024
Disposed
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Jan-2024
For Order
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Dec-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Nov-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Oct-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Aug-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Jul-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Jun-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-May-2023
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Apr-2023
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Mar-2023
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Feb-2023
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Jan-2023
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Dec-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Nov-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
03-Oct-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Sep-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Aug-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Jul-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-May-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Apr-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Feb-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Jan-2022
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Oct-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Sep-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Aug-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Jul-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
02-Jun-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-May-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Mar-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Jan-2021
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Dec-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Nov-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Oct-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Sep-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Aug-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Jul-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Apr-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
02-Mar-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
03-Feb-2020
For Framing of Issues
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Jan-2020
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Dec-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Oct-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Aug-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Jul-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Jun-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Jun-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Apr-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Feb-2019
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Dec-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Oct-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Aug-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Jun-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-May-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Apr-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
05-Mar-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
05-Feb-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
08-Jan-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
02-Jan-2018
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
04-Dec-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
06-Nov-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
03-Oct-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
09-Sep-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
10-Aug-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
10-Jul-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
05-Jun-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
08-May-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
10-Apr-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
06-Mar-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
06-Feb-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
02-Jan-2017
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
05-Dec-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Judge, Industrial Court
-
03-Oct-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Sep-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Aug-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Jul-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
03-May-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Mar-2016
For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Feb-2016
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Jan-2016
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
03-Nov-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Sep-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Aug-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Jun-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
02-May-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Apr-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
11-Mar-2015
Reply
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Jan-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2014
Case Summary: APP-ESI-65-2014 Case: M/S Shivam Motor Body Builders v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad Outcome: The petition is DISMISSED. The court upheld the ESI Corporation's assessment demanding Rs. 3,32,287/- in unpaid ESI contributions from the petitioner company. The court found the petitioner failed to adequately contest the assessment, rejected its claims that ESI provisions did not apply, and confirmed the corporation's inspection report and recovery demand as valid and legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts