M/S SHIVAM MOTOR BODY BUILDERS vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - S R THAKORE — 65/2014
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 075. Status: For Evidence of opponent. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.
CNR: GJAH170006032014
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
65/2014
Filing Date
27-11-2014
Registration No
65/2014
Registration Date
27-11-2014
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S SHIVAM MOTOR BODY BUILDERS
Adv. S R VIJAYVARGIY
Respondent(s)
REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - S R THAKORE
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
| 10-04-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
| 03-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 13-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 18-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: APP-ESI-65-2014 Case: M/S Shivam Motor Body Builders v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad Outcome: The petition is DISMISSED. The court upheld the ESI Corporation's assessment demanding Rs. 3,32,287/- in unpaid ESI contributions from the petitioner company. The court found the petitioner failed to adequately contest the assessment, rejected its claims that ESI provisions did not apply, and confirmed the corporation's inspection report and recovery demand as valid and legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APP-ESI-65-2014 Case: M/S Shivam Motor Body Builders v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad Outcome: The petition is DISMISSED. The court upheld the ESI Corporation's assessment demanding Rs. 3,32,287/- in unpaid ESI contributions from the petitioner company. The court found the petitioner failed to adequately contest the assessment, rejected its claims that ESI provisions did not apply, and confirmed the corporation's inspection report and recovery demand as valid and legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts