STEEL ART INDUSTRIES vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J RAVAL — 88/2023

Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.

CNR: GJAH170004892023

Filing Number

88/2023

Filing Date

26-Dec-2023

Registration No

88/2023

Registration Date

26-Dec-2023

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-President, Industrial Court

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STEEL ART INDUSTRIES

    Adv. P P JHAVERI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J RAVAL

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 29-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  10. 22-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  11. 23-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  13. 18-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  15. 07-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  16. 16-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  19. 04-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  20. 01-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    President, Industrial Court

  21. 03-Dec-2024

    For Framing of Issues

    President, Industrial Court

  22. 05-Nov-2024

    For Framing of Issues

    President, Industrial Court

  23. 11-Oct-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 88/2023 Steel Art Industries v. Regional Director ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad The petition challenged an ESI Act order against the petitioner company. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the petition, directing the respondent to not take any action against the petitioner or its proprietor. The petitioner had deposited 50% of the claimed amount (₹2,41,820) as interim relief ordered by the previous judge, which was acknowledged in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 11-Oct-2024

    For Framing of Issues

    President, Industrial Court

  25. 27-Sep-2024

    For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

    President, Industrial Court

  26. 28-Aug-2024

    Reply

    President, Industrial Court

  27. 12-Jul-2024

    Reply

    President, Industrial Court

  28. 17-May-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  29. 22-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  30. 14-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 26-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 88/2023 Steel Art Industries v. Regional Director ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad The petition challenged an ESI Act order against the petitioner company. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the petition, directing the respondent to not take any action against the petitioner or its proprietor. The petitioner had deposited 50% of the claimed amount (₹2,41,820) as interim relief ordered by the previous judge, which was acknowledged in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case