STEEL ART INDUSTRIES vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J RAVAL — 88/2023
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.
CNR: GJAH170004892023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
88/2023
Filing Date
26-12-2023
Registration No
88/2023
Registration Date
26-12-2023
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STEEL ART INDUSTRIES
Adv. P P JHAVERI
Respondent(s)
REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J RAVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 13-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 13-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 26-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 88/2023 Steel Art Industries v. Regional Director ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad The petition challenged an ESI Act order against the petitioner company. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the petition, directing the respondent to not take any action against the petitioner or its proprietor. The petitioner had deposited 50% of the claimed amount (₹2,41,820) as interim relief ordered by the previous judge, which was acknowledged in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 88/2023 Steel Art Industries v. Regional Director ESI Corporation, Ahmedabad The petition challenged an ESI Act order against the petitioner company. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the petition, directing the respondent to not take any action against the petitioner or its proprietor. The petitioner had deposited 50% of the claimed amount (₹2,41,820) as interim relief ordered by the previous judge, which was acknowledged in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts