CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs RAKESH C PATEL Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 224/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004622024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
224/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
224/2024
Registration Date
18-09-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
RAKESH C PATEL Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Evidence of Applicant
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 13-03-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 31-01-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
The application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for approval of dismissal of respondent Rakesh C. Patel has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court found that the employer failed to follow proper domestic inquiry procedures and did not provide the employee with adequate notice or opportunity to be heard before dismissal, thereby violating principles of natural justice and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for approval of dismissal of respondent Rakesh C. Patel has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court found that the employer failed to follow proper domestic inquiry procedures and did not provide the employee with adequate notice or opportunity to be heard before dismissal, thereby violating principles of natural justice and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts