CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs RAKESH I VYAS Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 220/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004582024
Filing Number
220/2024
Filing Date
17-Sep-2024
Registration No
220/2024
Registration Date
17-Sep-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-Member, Industrial Court
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAKESH I VYAS Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Apr-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
12-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
Summary of Case 220/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Rakesh I. Vyas (Advocate - P.J. Maharaja) Court: Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad Outcome The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The tribunal found that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, no charge sheet or notice was properly served on the employee before termination. Without proper documentation and domestic inquiry, the tribunal rejected the employer's request for court approval of the dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
22-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
17-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
30-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
28-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
24-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
27-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
30-Jan-2025
For w.s. of opponent
Member, Industrial Court
-
26-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 220/2024
Summary of Case 220/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Rakesh I. Vyas (Advocate - P.J. Maharaja) Court: Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad Outcome The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The tribunal found that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, no charge sheet or notice was properly served on the employee before termination. Without proper documentation and domestic inquiry, the tribunal rejected the employer's request for court approval of the dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts