CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs RAKESH I VYAS Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 220/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.

CNR: GJAH170004582024

Filing Number

220/2024

Filing Date

17-Sep-2024

Registration No

220/2024

Registration Date

17-Sep-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.

    Adv. P I SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH I VYAS Advocate - P J MAHARAJA

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-May-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 220/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Rakesh I. Vyas (Advocate - P.J. Maharaja) Court: Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad Outcome The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The tribunal found that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, no charge sheet or notice was properly served on the employee before termination. Without proper documentation and domestic inquiry, the tribunal rejected the employer's request for court approval of the dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 27-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 30-Jan-2025

    For w.s. of opponent

    Member, Industrial Court

  19. 26-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 17-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 220/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Rakesh I. Vyas (Advocate - P.J. Maharaja) Court: Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad Outcome The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The tribunal found that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, no charge sheet or notice was properly served on the employee before termination. Without proper documentation and domestic inquiry, the tribunal rejected the employer's request for court approval of the dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case