CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 217/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004552024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
217/2024
Filing Date
17-09-2024
Registration No
217/2024
Registration Date
17-09-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Evidence of Applicant
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 13-03-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 31-01-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts