CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 217/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004552024
Filing Number
217/2024
Filing Date
17-Sep-2024
Registration No
217/2024
Registration Date
17-Sep-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-Member, Industrial Court
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Apr-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
12-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
22-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
17-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
30-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
28-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
24-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
27-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 217/2024
Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts