CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 217/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.

CNR: GJAH170004552024

Filing Number

217/2024

Filing Date

17-Sep-2024

Registration No

217/2024

Registration Date

17-Sep-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.

    Adv. P I SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D K BHARVAD Advocate - P J MAHARAJA

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-May-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 27-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 09-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 17-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Application No. 217/2024 Parties: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. D.K. Bharvad (Respondent/Worker) Outcome: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The worker's dismissal order cannot be approved because the employer failed to follow mandatory legal procedures—specifically, no formal charge sheet or notice of misconduct was provided to the worker before dismissal, violating natural justice principles and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case