CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs HIMMATBHAI ABHESANG CHAUHAN Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 216/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004542024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
216/2024
Filing Date
17-09-2024
Registration No
216/2024
Registration Date
17-09-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
HIMMATBHAI ABHESANG CHAUHAN Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Evidence of Applicant
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 13-03-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 31-01-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
Case 216/2024 Summary Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Himmatbhai Abhesang Chauhan (Employee) Outcome: The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been REJECTED/DISMISSED. The court found that the employer failed to follow proper domestic inquiry procedures before dismissing the employee, no charge sheet was issued, and the dismissal was deemed unfair labour practice. The case is adjourned for further hearing on 12/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 216/2024 Summary Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Himmatbhai Abhesang Chauhan (Employee) Outcome: The petitioner's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been REJECTED/DISMISSED. The court found that the employer failed to follow proper domestic inquiry procedures before dismissing the employee, no charge sheet was issued, and the dismissal was deemed unfair labour practice. The case is adjourned for further hearing on 12/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts