CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs PATEL ALPESH S Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 214/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.

CNR: GJAH170004522024

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

Filing Number

214/2024

Filing Date

17-09-2024

Registration No

214/2024

Registration Date

17-09-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Preliminary Issue Section CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.PATEL ALPESH S

Petitioner(s)

CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.

Adv. P I SHAH

Respondent(s)

PATEL ALPESH S Advocate - P J MAHARAJA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

28-05-2026

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

18-04-2026

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

13-03-2026

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

12-02-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

31-01-2026

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

Interim Orders

31-01-2026
ORDER

SUMMARY The approval application (No. 214/2024) filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking court approval to dismiss an employee (Patel Alpesh S) during a pending industrial dispute was REJECTED/DISMISSED. The tribunal found that the employer failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Section 33(2)(b), including serving a proper charge-sheet and conducting a domestic inquiry, and accordingly rejected the dismissal approval request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The approval application (No. 214/2024) filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking court approval to dismiss an employee (Patel Alpesh S) during a pending industrial dispute was REJECTED/DISMISSED. The tribunal found that the employer failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Section 33(2)(b), including serving a proper charge-sheet and conducting a domestic inquiry, and accordingly rejected the dismissal approval request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case