CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs PATEL SUNIL BHUPENDRABHAI Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 213/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.

CNR: GJAH170004512024

Filing Number

213/2024

Filing Date

17-Sep-2024

Registration No

213/2024

Registration Date

17-Sep-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.

    Adv. P I SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL SUNIL BHUPENDRABHAI Advocate - P J MAHARAJA

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-May-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 213/2024 Case: Approval Application 213/2024 under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2)(b) Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Patel Sunil Bhupendrabhai (Employee), represented by union advocate P.J. Maharaja Outcome: The Industrial Tribunal (presided by Smt. Raziya Salimkhan Pathan, Chief Officer) dismissed the company's approval application. The tribunal found that Cadila Pharmaceuticals failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 33(2)(b), including issuance of proper charge sheets and domestic inquiry. The application was rejected as legally infirm and contrary to standing orders and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 27-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 09-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 17-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 213/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 213/2024 Case: Approval Application 213/2024 under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2)(b) Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Patel Sunil Bhupendrabhai (Employee), represented by union advocate P.J. Maharaja Outcome: The Industrial Tribunal (presided by Smt. Raziya Salimkhan Pathan, Chief Officer) dismissed the company's approval application. The tribunal found that Cadila Pharmaceuticals failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 33(2)(b), including issuance of proper charge sheets and domestic inquiry. The application was rejected as legally infirm and contrary to standing orders and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case