CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs PATEL SUNIL BHUPENDRABHAI Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 213/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004512024
Filing Number
213/2024
Filing Date
17-Sep-2024
Registration No
213/2024
Registration Date
17-Sep-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-Member, Industrial Court
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.PATEL SUNIL BHUPENDRABHAI Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Apr-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
12-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
Summary of Case 213/2024 Case: Approval Application 213/2024 under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2)(b) Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Patel Sunil Bhupendrabhai (Employee), represented by union advocate P.J. Maharaja Outcome: The Industrial Tribunal (presided by Smt. Raziya Salimkhan Pathan, Chief Officer) dismissed the company's approval application. The tribunal found that Cadila Pharmaceuticals failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 33(2)(b), including issuance of proper charge sheets and domestic inquiry. The application was rejected as legally infirm and contrary to standing orders and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-Jan-2026
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
22-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
18-Dec-2025
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
Member, Industrial Court
-
17-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
30-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
28-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
24-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
27-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Member, Industrial Court
-
09-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 213/2024
Summary of Case 213/2024 Case: Approval Application 213/2024 under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2)(b) Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Patel Sunil Bhupendrabhai (Employee), represented by union advocate P.J. Maharaja Outcome: The Industrial Tribunal (presided by Smt. Raziya Salimkhan Pathan, Chief Officer) dismissed the company's approval application. The tribunal found that Cadila Pharmaceuticals failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 33(2)(b), including issuance of proper charge sheets and domestic inquiry. The application was rejected as legally infirm and contrary to standing orders and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts