CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs HITUL M PATEL Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 211/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004492024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
211/2024
Filing Date
17-09-2024
Registration No
211/2024
Registration Date
17-09-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
HITUL M PATEL Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Evidence of Applicant
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 13-03-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 31-01-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY - Case 211/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Hitul M Patel (Employee) Order: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking court approval for the dismissal of employee Hitul M Patel, has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The Industrial Tribunal found that the company failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements including providing proper notice, charge sheet, and opportunity to the employee to present their defense before dismissal, and therefore rejected the approval application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY - Case 211/2024 Petitioner: Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Respondent: Hitul M Patel (Employee) Order: The approval application filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking court approval for the dismissal of employee Hitul M Patel, has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The Industrial Tribunal found that the company failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements including providing proper notice, charge sheet, and opportunity to the employee to present their defense before dismissal, and therefore rejected the approval application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts