CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD. vs P U SEVAK Advocate - P J MAHARAJA — 208/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Status: For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004462024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
208/2024
Filing Date
17-09-2024
Registration No
208/2024
Registration Date
17-09-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CADILA PHARMASCUTICALS LTD.
Adv. P I SHAH
Respondent(s)
P U SEVAK Advocate - P J MAHARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
For Evidence of Applicant
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 13-03-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 31-01-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 208/2024 Court: Industrial Justice Tribunal, Ahmedabad Petitioner: CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. Respondent: P U SEVAK Advocate (Union Representative) - P J MAHARAJA Order: The petitioner's approval application (Appeal No. 208/2024) under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is REJECTED/DISMISSED. The tribunal found the dismissal order against the worker was issued without proper domestic inquiry procedures and without furnishing the requisite charge sheet, rejecting the company's request for court-supervised investigation of the alleged misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 208/2024 Court: Industrial Justice Tribunal, Ahmedabad Petitioner: CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. Respondent: P U SEVAK Advocate (Union Representative) - P J MAHARAJA Order: The petitioner's approval application (Appeal No. 208/2024) under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is REJECTED/DISMISSED. The tribunal found the dismissal order against the worker was issued without proper domestic inquiry procedures and without furnishing the requisite charge sheet, rejecting the company's request for court-supervised investigation of the alleged misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts