R.M.P BEARINGS PVT LTD. vs SHRI. VIJAYSINH HASUBHA PARMAR Advocate - A N PATEL — 88/2017

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 330. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.

CNR: GJAH170004202017

For Evidence of Applicant

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

88/2017

Filing Date

01-07-2017

Registration No

88/2017

Registration Date

01-07-2017

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 330
Ia/1/2018 Classification : Preliminary Issue Section R.M.P BEARINGS PVT LTD.SHRI. VIJAYSINH HASUBHA PARMAR

Petitioner(s)

R.M.P BEARINGS PVT LTD.

Adv. A S PARIKH

Respondent(s)

SHRI. VIJAYSINH HASUBHA PARMAR Advocate - A N PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

28-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

20-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

07-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

02-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

25-03-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

Interim Orders

09-02-2018
JUDEGEMENT
27-02-2023
ORDER

Summary The Industrial Court of Ahmedabad set aside the employer's disciplinary action (suspension order) against the worker for being contrary to principles of natural justice. The court found the investigation process defective and the suspension unjustifiable, ordering the worker's reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court of Ahmedabad set aside the employer's disciplinary action (suspension order) against the worker for being contrary to principles of natural justice. The court found the investigation process defective and the suspension unjustifiable, ordering the worker's reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case