CHMEMICAL MAJDUR PANCHYAT vs T.V.S LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD Advocate - B M JOSHI — 72/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170002802022
Filing Number
72/2022
Filing Date
06-10-2022
Registration No
72/2022
Registration Date
06-10-2022
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHMEMICAL MAJDUR PANCHYAT
Adv. L M PATIL
Respondent(s)
T.V.S LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD Advocate - B M JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of first party
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | For award |
| 11-03-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 25-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad dismissed the reference filed by the Chemical Workers Union (Reference IT No. 72/2022) against TVS Logistics Services Ltd., finding that the workers' claims lacked merit due to procedural and jurisdictional defects. The court determined that the relevant company had ceased operations on 30/06/2022, and the workers had failed to establish a valid cause of action against the employer during the material period, thereby rejecting all relief sought by the union. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad dismissed the reference filed by the Chemical Workers Union (Reference IT No. 72/2022) against TVS Logistics Services Ltd., finding that the workers' claims lacked merit due to procedural and jurisdictional defects. The court determined that the relevant company had ceased operations on 30/06/2022, and the workers had failed to establish a valid cause of action against the employer during the material period, thereby rejecting all relief sought by the union. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts