DIVISONAL CONTROLLER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PALANPUR vs KUNTAL KUMAR KALIDAS PATEL — 106/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33/2/B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170002722024
Filing Number
106/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
106/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIVISONAL CONTROLLER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PALANPUR
Adv. P F JHAVERI
Respondent(s)
KUNTAL KUMAR KALIDAS PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Argument of opponent
For Argument of Applicant
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | For Order |
| 13-04-2026 | For Argument of opponent |
| 08-04-2026 | For Argument of Applicant |
| 23-03-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad allowed the employer's appeal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, upholding the dismissal of employee Kuntal Kumar Kalidasbhai Patel, a driver at the ST Depot in Tharad. The tribunal found that the dismissal proceedings followed legal procedures and natural justice principles, and the employer had complied with mandatory requirements of providing one month's wages as prescribed under the Act. The employee failed to appear or contest the charges despite proper notice, leading to confirmation of his termination from service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad allowed the employer's appeal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, upholding the dismissal of employee Kuntal Kumar Kalidasbhai Patel, a driver at the ST Depot in Tharad. The tribunal found that the dismissal proceedings followed legal procedures and natural justice principles, and the employer had complied with mandatory requirements of providing one month's wages as prescribed under the Act. The employee failed to appear or contest the charges despite proper notice, leading to confirmation of his termination from service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts