SHREE VIDHYUT KAMDAR SANGH GANDHINAGAR vs GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VADODARA — 15/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 A. Status: For Evidence of opponent. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
COMP IT - COMPLAINT I.T.
CNR: GJAH170001752025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
15/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
29-04-2025
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHREE VIDHYUT KAMDAR SANGH GANDHINAGAR
Adv. A R MIRZA
Respondent(s)
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VADODARA
MADHYA GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD VADODARA
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD SURAT
PACHIM GUJART VIJ COMPANY LTD RAJKOT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of opponent
For Other evidence of Applicant
For Other evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat
For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
| 01-04-2026 | For Other evidence of Applicant |
| 11-03-2026 | For Other evidence of Applicant |
| 11-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat |
| 13-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Tribunal rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of 50 terminated electricity distribution company employees. While the tribunal found a prima facie case that employees were terminated during pending conciliation proceedings in violation of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, it denied interim reinstatement, holding that final relief (reinstatement) cannot be granted at the interim stage and restitution remains available if employees succeed in the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of 50 terminated electricity distribution company employees. While the tribunal found a prima facie case that employees were terminated during pending conciliation proceedings in violation of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, it denied interim reinstatement, holding that final relief (reinstatement) cannot be granted at the interim stage and restitution remains available if employees succeed in the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts