HASANALI RASULBHAI PATEL vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J BHATT — 25/2021
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th April 2026.
APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.
CNR: GJAH170001422021
Filing Number
25/2021
Filing Date
30-06-2021
Registration No
25/2021
Registration Date
30-06-2021
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HASANALI RASULBHAI PATEL
Adv. V S PATIL
Respondent(s)
REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - A J BHATT
RECOVERY OFFICER, E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Argument of Applicant
For Argument of Applicant
For Argument of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | For Order |
| 11-03-2026 | For Argument of Applicant |
| 04-02-2026 | For Argument of Applicant |
| 28-01-2026 | For Argument of Applicant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad Employees State Insurance Court partially allowed the application and set aside the ESI demand order of Rs. 3,53,925/- passed under Section 45-A dated 09/06/2017. The court found discrepancies in the code numbers used (37000267010001102 vs. 37000283050001102) and remanded the matter back to the ESI Authority for reconsideration, directing it to provide the applicant ample opportunity for hearing and to decide the case on merits after considering all evidence and applicability of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad Employees State Insurance Court partially allowed the application and set aside the ESI demand order of Rs. 3,53,925/- passed under Section 45-A dated 09/06/2017. The court found discrepancies in the code numbers used (37000267010001102 vs. 37000283050001102) and remanded the matter back to the ESI Authority for reconsideration, directing it to provide the applicant ample opportunity for hearing and to decide the case on merits after considering all evidence and applicability of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts