CHEMICAL MAJDOOR PANCHAYAT, AHMEDABAD vs PLANT HEAD, TVS LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD, AHMEDABAD Advocate - B M JOSHI — 41/2021

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.

CNR: GJAH170000542021

Filing Number

41/2021

Filing Date

19-Feb-2021

Registration No

41/2021

Registration Date

19-Feb-2021

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

3-Member, Industrial Court

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHEMICAL MAJDOOR PANCHAYAT, AHMEDABAD

    Adv. L.M.PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PLANT HEAD, TVS LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD, AHMEDABAD Advocate - B M JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad rejected the union's reference seeking various wage increases and benefits for workers at TVS Logistics Services (a Ford India contractor) for the period October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2022. The court found the union failed to prove its claims with documentary evidence and comparables from similar industries in the region, as required under the Industry-cum-Region wage-fixing test. The union also lacked legal standing to demand union recognition as no constitutional authority exists for such relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    For award

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Argument of first party

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 15-Sep-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    For Other evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  19. 30-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  20. 08-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  21. 30-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  22. 12-May-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  23. 01-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  24. 05-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  25. 08-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  26. 13-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  28. 24-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  29. 15-May-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  30. 20-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  31. 07-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  32. 20-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  33. 25-Oct-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  34. 13-Sep-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  35. 26-Jul-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  36. 14-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  37. 10-May-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  38. 21-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  39. 11-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  40. 29-Dec-2022

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  41. 25-Nov-2022

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  42. 14-Oct-2022

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  43. 05-Sep-2022

    For Evidence of Second party

    Member, Industrial Court

  44. 16-Jul-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  45. 13-Jun-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  46. 02-May-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  47. 04-Apr-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  48. 07-Mar-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  49. 24-Jan-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  50. 13-Dec-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  51. 25-Oct-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Member, Industrial Court

  52. 03-Sep-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Member, Industrial Court

  53. 30-Jul-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Member, Industrial Court

  54. 18-Jun-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Member, Industrial Court

  55. 07-May-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Member, Industrial Court

  56. 09-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 19-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad rejected the union's reference seeking various wage increases and benefits for workers at TVS Logistics Services (a Ford India contractor) for the period October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2022. The court found the union failed to prove its claims with documentary evidence and comparables from similar industries in the region, as required under the Industry-cum-Region wage-fixing test. The union also lacked legal standing to demand union recognition as no constitutional authority exists for such relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case