CHEMICAL MAJDOOR PANCHAYAT, AHMEDABAD vs PLANT HEAD, TVS LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD, AHMEDABAD Advocate - B M JOSHI — 41/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170000542021
Filing Number
41/2021
Filing Date
19-02-2021
Registration No
41/2021
Registration Date
19-02-2021
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHEMICAL MAJDOOR PANCHAYAT, AHMEDABAD
Adv. L.M.PATIL
Respondent(s)
PLANT HEAD, TVS LOGISTIC SERVICES LTD, AHMEDABAD Advocate - B M JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of first party
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | For award |
| 11-03-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 25-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad rejected the union's reference seeking various wage increases and benefits for workers at TVS Logistics Services (a Ford India contractor) for the period October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2022. The court found the union failed to prove its claims with documentary evidence and comparables from similar industries in the region, as required under the Industry-cum-Region wage-fixing test. The union also lacked legal standing to demand union recognition as no constitutional authority exists for such relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad rejected the union's reference seeking various wage increases and benefits for workers at TVS Logistics Services (a Ford India contractor) for the period October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2022. The court found the union failed to prove its claims with documentary evidence and comparables from similar industries in the region, as required under the Industry-cum-Region wage-fixing test. The union also lacked legal standing to demand union recognition as no constitutional authority exists for such relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts