DIVISIONAL CONTROLER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD vs MITALBEN VELJIBHAI CHAUDHARI — 14/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 16th April 2026.
APP IT - APPLICATION I.T.
CNR: GJAH170000342024
Filing Number
14/2024
Filing Date
31-01-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
31-01-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIVISIONAL CONTROLER GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD
Adv. P F JHAVERI
Respondent(s)
MITALBEN VELJIBHAI CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Argument of opponent
For Argument of Applicant
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | For Order |
| 01-04-2026 | For Argument of opponent |
| 23-03-2026 | For Argument of Applicant |
| 11-03-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal in Ahmedabad approved the employer's application for consent to terminate an ST bus conductor (permanent employee badge no. 800) from Gandhinagar depot under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found that the employer followed proper procedure—including a departmental inquiry, show-cause notice, and natural justice principles—before dismissing the employee, and therefore granted permission to implement the termination order along with one month's wages compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal in Ahmedabad approved the employer's application for consent to terminate an ST bus conductor (permanent employee badge no. 800) from Gandhinagar depot under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found that the employer followed proper procedure—including a departmental inquiry, show-cause notice, and natural justice principles—before dismissing the employee, and therefore granted permission to implement the termination order along with one month's wages compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts