KOPS SECURITY SERVICES vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - J K PURANI — 5/2024

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Member, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

For Evidence of Applicant

President, Industrial Court

OrderView PDF

OrderView PDF

Summary The ESI Court granted a partial stay of the ESI Corporation's recovery order dated 14.09.2022, but conditioned it on the applicant depositing 25% of the contribution amount (Rs. 1,21,751) within 30 days. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that two of its three operating locations (Santej and Rajpur) fell outside the ESI Act's implemented area, justifying a waiver of 75% of the dues, while rejecting the unsupported claim of being a "sick unit." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

For Framing of Issues

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

For Hearing of Inetrim Relief application

President, Industrial Court

Reply

Member, Industrial Court

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 5/2024