KOPS SECURITY SERVICES vs REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - J K PURANI — 5/2024
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.
CNR: GJAH170000322024
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
30-01-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KOPS SECURITY SERVICES
Adv. A K CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD Advocate - J K PURANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRESIDENT, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 11-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 04-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 17-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 12-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary The ESI Court granted a partial stay of the ESI Corporation's recovery order dated 14.09.2022, but conditioned it on the applicant depositing 25% of the contribution amount (Rs. 1,21,751) within 30 days. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that two of its three operating locations (Santej and Rajpur) fell outside the ESI Act's implemented area, justifying a waiver of 75% of the dues, while rejecting the unsupported claim of being a "sick unit." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The ESI Court granted a partial stay of the ESI Corporation's recovery order dated 14.09.2022, but conditioned it on the applicant depositing 25% of the contribution amount (Rs. 1,21,751) within 30 days. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that two of its three operating locations (Santej and Rajpur) fell outside the ESI Act's implemented area, justifying a waiver of 75% of the dues, while rejecting the unsupported claim of being a "sick unit." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts