BABUBHAI GANESHBHAI PATEL vs SHEELABEN NAGJIBHAI DESAI Advocate - R A SHAH — 54/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH150006182024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

Filing Number

54/2024

Filing Date

23-07-2024

Registration No

54/2024

Registration Date

23-07-2024

Court

Taluka Court, Detroj

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 31,34,38

Petitioner(s)

BABUBHAI GANESHBHAI PATEL

Adv. A M RAVAL

DINESHBHAI GANESHBHAI PATEL

Adv. A M RAVAL

Respondent(s)

SHEELABEN NAGJIBHAI DESAI Advocate - R A SHAH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-05-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

01-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

07-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-12-2024
ORDER

Summary The court order in case R.C.S.54/2024 dismisses the plaintiffs' revision petition (Aank-5). The court finds that the plaintiffs failed to establish grounds for revision and their claims regarding alleged irregularities in property registration, general power of attorney, and sale deed execution lack merit. The order upholds the lower court's decision directing completion of property registration formalities and declares that plaintiffs have no further legal rights over the disputed agricultural land property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court order in case R.C.S.54/2024 dismisses the plaintiffs' revision petition (Aank-5). The court finds that the plaintiffs failed to establish grounds for revision and their claims regarding alleged irregularities in property registration, general power of attorney, and sale deed execution lack merit. The order upholds the lower court's decision directing completion of property registration formalities and declares that plaintiffs have no further legal rights over the disputed agricultural land property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Taluka Court, Detroj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case