MANAGER SHREE, BANK OF BARODA vs RAJUBHA VITHTHALSING SOLANKI — 27/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH150002642024

Filing Number

27/2024

Filing Date

18-Mar-2024

Registration No

27/2024

Registration Date

18-Mar-2024

Court

Taluka Court, Detroj

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGER SHREE, BANK OF BARODA

    Adv. R A SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHA VITHTHALSING SOLANKI

  2. 2.VINUBHA VITHTHALASANG SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Jetpur granted a partially successful judgment in favor of Bank of Baroda against defendants Rajubha and Vinubha Golanki in a loan recovery suit. The court ordered Defendant No. 1 to repay Rs. 26,700/- (the outstanding loan amount as of 31.03.2023) with 9% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, and held Defendant No. 1 liable for recovery from his personal and mortgaged property. The bank was permitted to recover the dues through legal execution if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 16-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 26-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 28-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 07-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 27-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 03-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 15-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 26-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 22-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 18-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Jetpur granted a partially successful judgment in favor of Bank of Baroda against defendants Rajubha and Vinubha Golanki in a loan recovery suit. The court ordered Defendant No. 1 to repay Rs. 26,700/- (the outstanding loan amount as of 31.03.2023) with 9% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, and held Defendant No. 1 liable for recovery from his personal and mortgaged property. The bank was permitted to recover the dues through legal execution if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case