MANAGER, SBI- KATOSAN ROAD BRANCH vs DUNGARJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - S J ZALA — 74/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH150002632022

Case disposed

Filing Number

74/2022

Filing Date

06-07-2022

Registration No

74/2022

Registration Date

06-07-2022

Court

Taluka Court, Detroj

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

MANAGER, SBI- KATOSAN ROAD BRANCH

Adv. R A SHAH

Respondent(s)

DUNGARJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - S J ZALA

SANTOKBEN RUPSANGJI THAKOR

RUPSANGJI MAFAJI THAKOR

KAPURJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR

RAMESHJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR

RANGAJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

04-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

07-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

10-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT
18-03-2026
DECREE

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Betrojd court partially allowed State Bank of India's claim against six defendants for recovery of Rs. 3,01,021 (principal loan amount of Rs. 2,36,000 plus accrued interest). The court directed the defendants to jointly and severally pay the bank the claimed amount with 9% per annum interest from the date of judgment until full payment, and authorized the bank to recover the amount from the defendants' immovable and movable properties. One defendant was dismissed from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Betrojd court partially allowed State Bank of India's claim against six defendants for recovery of Rs. 3,01,021 (principal loan amount of Rs. 2,36,000 plus accrued interest). The court directed the defendants to jointly and severally pay the bank the claimed amount with 9% per annum interest from the date of judgment until full payment, and authorized the bank to recover the amount from the defendants' immovable and movable properties. One defendant was dismissed from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Taluka Court, Detroj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case