STATE OF GUJARAT vs KHODAJI SHANKERJI THAKORE(Abated) Advocate - A.M.SOLANKI — 150/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,420,465,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH150001662017
Filing Number
150/2017
Filing Date
27-07-2005
Registration No
150/2017
Registration Date
27-07-2005
Court
Taluka Court, Detroj
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
DETROJ POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KHODAJI SHANKERJI THAKORE(Abated) Advocate - A.M.SOLANKI
AMBALAL MAGANLAL VALAND
Adv. A M SOLANKI
KADAVAJI SANKAJI THAKOR
Adv. A M SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of the Court's Decision The Court acquitted both accused (Ambalal Maganlal Valand and Kadwaji Shankaji Thakor) of charges under IPC Sections 409, 420, 465, and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary weaknesses were: (1) lack of original documents and failure to establish why original records were unavailable per Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act; (2) insufficient proof of financial loss or illegal gain by the accused; and (3) absence of evidence showing fraudulent intent. The court granted bail benefits and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of the Court's Decision The Court acquitted both accused (Ambalal Maganlal Valand and Kadwaji Shankaji Thakor) of charges under IPC Sections 409, 420, 465, and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary weaknesses were: (1) lack of original documents and failure to establish why original records were unavailable per Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act; (2) insufficient proof of financial loss or illegal gain by the accused; and (3) absence of evidence showing fraudulent intent. The court granted bail benefits and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts