STATE GOVERNMENT vs BAKABHAI RAMCHANDBHAI DHUNKH Advocate - M M SHAIKH — 766/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 116(A)(E),98(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH120010232025

Case disposed

Filing Number

766/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

766/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

HASALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 116(A)(E),98(B),81
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

STATE GOVERNMENT

Respondent(s)

BAKABHAI RAMCHANDBHAI DHUNKH Advocate - M M SHAIKH

SANDIPSINH ANIRUDDHASINH ZALA

Adv. H N DALVADI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Judgment Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 766/2025, Mandal Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons (Bakabhai Ramchandbhai Dhukh and Sandipsinh Anirudhsinh Jhala) of charges under the Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, finding insufficient corroborated evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the seizure of alcohol and vehicle through credible independent witness testimony, as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 766/2025, Mandal Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons (Bakabhai Ramchandbhai Dhukh and Sandipsinh Anirudhsinh Jhala) of charges under the Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, finding insufficient corroborated evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the seizure of alcohol and vehicle through credible independent witness testimony, as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANDAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case