STATE GOVERNMENT vs SHREERAM BHERARAM BISNOI Advocate - A G KACHHOT — 447/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B,98(2),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH120006052024
Filing Number
447/2024
Filing Date
28-06-2024
Registration No
447/2024
Registration Date
28-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192005230105
Police Station
HASALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE GOVERNMENT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHREERAM BHERARAM BISNOI Advocate - A G KACHHOT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Shriram Bheraram Bishnoi, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(I), IPC Sections 116(B), 98(2), 81, and IPC Sections 467, 471, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies: the panch witnesses could not corroborate the seizure of contraband liquor, there was no independent evidence supporting the alleged recovery, and the prosecution failed to establish the accused's possession of the seized materials. Therefore, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Shriram Bheraram Bishnoi, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(I), IPC Sections 116(B), 98(2), 81, and IPC Sections 467, 471, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies: the panch witnesses could not corroborate the seizure of contraband liquor, there was no independent evidence supporting the alleged recovery, and the prosecution failed to establish the accused's possession of the seized materials. Therefore, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts