UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD. vs USMANGANI GULAMRASUL SAIYADALI URFE GADABAPU Advocate - A G KACHHOT — 31/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH120004932025
Filing Number
31/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
31/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD.
Adv. A J SATHVARA
Respondent(s)
USMANGANI GULAMRASUL SAIYADALI URFE GADABAPU Advocate - A G KACHHOT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 12-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 24-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 23-01-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 31/2025 Summary: The National lok Adalat resolved this dispute between Uttar Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. (petitioner) and Usmangani Gulamrasul Saiyadali (respondent) through a settlement agreement. The court approved the settlement whereby the claim amount of ₹127,000 was settled with the respondent paying ₹3,000 immediately and the remaining balance over 10 installments. The court ordered case closure as per the agreed terms, with no order on costs and court fee refund to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 31/2025 Summary: The National lok Adalat resolved this dispute between Uttar Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. (petitioner) and Usmangani Gulamrasul Saiyadali (respondent) through a settlement agreement. The court approved the settlement whereby the claim amount of ₹127,000 was settled with the respondent paying ₹3,000 immediately and the remaining balance over 10 installments. The court ordered case closure as per the agreed terms, with no order on costs and court fee refund to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts