UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD. vs KODABHAI CHOTHABHAI Advocate - EX PARTY — 347/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R-2. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH100048012025

Filing Number

347/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

347/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R-2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. A J SATHVARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KODABHAI CHOTHABHAI Advocate - EX PARTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Viramgam Senior Civil Judge partially allowed the plaintiff company's suit for recovery of Rs. 10,524 with 18% annual interest from the defendant from the date of the final notice (March 21, 2025) until full payment, along with court costs borne by the defendant. The court found the defendant liable as an authorized electricity consumer with outstanding dues for power supply charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 347/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Viramgam Senior Civil Judge partially allowed the plaintiff company's suit for recovery of Rs. 10,524 with 18% annual interest from the defendant from the date of the final notice (March 21, 2025) until full payment, along with court costs borne by the defendant. The court found the defendant liable as an authorized electricity consumer with outstanding dues for power supply charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case