MUSKAN D/O GULAMMAYUDDIN NURUBHAI GHANCHI AND W/O MOIZBHAI YUSUFBHAI GHANCHI(MALVI) vs MOIZBHAI YUSUFBHAI GHANCHI(MALVI) Advocate - K D CHAVDA — 464/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH100043952025

Filing Number

464/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

464/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSKAN D/O GULAMMAYUDDIN NURUBHAI GHANCHI AND W/O MOIZBHAI YUSUFBHAI GHANCHI(MALVI)

    Adv. G G VAIDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOIZBHAI YUSUFBHAI GHANCHI(MALVI) Advocate - K D CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition, holding that once the defendant pays the full outstanding amount as ordered, the petitioner has no right to pursue the case further and must withdraw it accordingly. The court's decision was based on the principle that satisfaction of the decree obligation extinguishes the plaintiff's cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 464/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition, holding that once the defendant pays the full outstanding amount as ordered, the petitioner has no right to pursue the case further and must withdraw it accordingly. The court's decision was based on the principle that satisfaction of the decree obligation extinguishes the plaintiff's cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case