Government of Gujarat vs KARANBHAI CHOTAJI THAKOR Advocate - G M DAMOR — 2995/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH100039692025
e-Filing Number
12-03-2025
Filing Number
2995/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
2995/2025
Registration Date
10-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192060250068
Police Station
VIRAMGAM- RURAL POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KARANBHAI CHOTAJI THAKOR Advocate - G M DAMOR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Karanbhai Chotaji Thakore of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the seized liquor (13 liters valued at Rs. 2,600) was not recovered from the accused's direct possession, the panchnama witnesses could not substantiate the seizure details, and independent corroborating evidence was absent, leaving reasonable doubt favoring the accused as per established criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Karanbhai Chotaji Thakore of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the seized liquor (13 liters valued at Rs. 2,600) was not recovered from the accused's direct possession, the panchnama witnesses could not substantiate the seizure details, and independent corroborating evidence was absent, leaving reasonable doubt favoring the accused as per established criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts