PATHAN IMRANKHAN SABBIRKHAN vs PATEL SAIDAHMAD ISHMAILEBHAI Advocate - R A SHAIKH — 2132/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH100027602025

Filing Number

2132/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

2132/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATHAN IMRANKHAN SABBIRKHAN

    Adv. M I SAIYED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL SAIDAHMAD ISHMAILEBHAI Advocate - R A SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner and their spouse have been settled/compensated under the provisions of Section 18 of the relevant act. The court found no grounds to entertain further proceedings and directed that the case be closed, with costs imposed on the petitioner as per the court's discretionary authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2132/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner and their spouse have been settled/compensated under the provisions of Section 18 of the relevant act. The court found no grounds to entertain further proceedings and directed that the case be closed, with costs imposed on the petitioner as per the court's discretionary authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case