UTTAR GUJARAT VIG COMPANY LTD, VIRAMGAM vs BHARATBHAI KALUBHAI THAKOR — 210/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH100018872023

Filing Number

210/2023

Filing Date

16-Oct-2023

Registration No

210/2023

Registration Date

16-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTTAR GUJARAT VIG COMPANY LTD, VIRAMGAM

    Adv. A J SATHVARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI KALUBHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The civil court in Viramgam dismissed the electricity company's suit against the defendant for alleged electricity theft and recovery of Rs. 94,775. Although the company produced evidence of unauthorized meter bypass and submitted bills for the alleged theft, the court found that the documentary evidence and records failed to conclusively establish that the defendant (Bhartbhai Kalubhai Thakor) was the actual electricity consumer or responsible party, as the customer name in all official documents was listed as Keshiben Talaji Thakor, not the defendant. Consequently, the court rejected all claims and awarded no relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  15. 16-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  16. 05-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    Issues

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  19. 04-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  20. 07-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  21. 03-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  22. 11-Sep-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  23. 29-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  24. 08-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  25. 25-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  26. 29-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  27. 23-Apr-2024

    Summons - Notice

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  28. 06-Mar-2024

    Summons - Notice

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  29. 20-Jan-2024

    Summons - Notice

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  30. 06-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 16-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 210/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The civil court in Viramgam dismissed the electricity company's suit against the defendant for alleged electricity theft and recovery of Rs. 94,775. Although the company produced evidence of unauthorized meter bypass and submitted bills for the alleged theft, the court found that the documentary evidence and records failed to conclusively establish that the defendant (Bhartbhai Kalubhai Thakor) was the actual electricity consumer or responsible party, as the customer name in all official documents was listed as Keshiben Talaji Thakor, not the defendant. Consequently, the court rejected all claims and awarded no relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case