JADAV SMIT RAMESHBHAI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 79/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH100005212026

Case disposed

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

31102260028292

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

JADAV SMIT RAMESHBHAI

Adv. S J PARMAR

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

27-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Sections 497 and 503, ordering the release of frozen bank funds (totaling ₹84,791) that were seized during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to the funds as the investigation concluded the complainant had filed a false case, and ordered the funds to be credited back to the petitioner's designated bank account after furnishing a bond and security deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Sections 497 and 503, ordering the release of frozen bank funds (totaling ₹84,791) that were seized during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to the funds as the investigation concluded the complainant had filed a false case, and ordered the funds to be credited back to the petitioner's designated bank account after furnishing a bond and security deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case