TAI RIYAZ ISHMAILEBHAI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 67/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH100003852026
Filing Number
67/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
67/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31101260014949
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAI RIYAZ ISHMAILEBHAI
Adv. A S MADAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Cr.P.C. Sections 457 and 503, ordering the release of Rs. 20,007/- frozen in the petitioner's Punjab National Bank account. The court found that the petitioner (a fraud victim) was entitled to possession of the funds, as the investigating officer had determined the original complaint to be false and established no legal basis for continued freezing. The court directed the investigating officer to release the frozen amount within 10 days with proper documentation and security measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Hearing
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2026
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Cr.P.C. Sections 457 and 503, ordering the release of Rs. 20,007/- frozen in the petitioner's Punjab National Bank account. The court found that the petitioner (a fraud victim) was entitled to possession of the funds, as the investigating officer had determined the original complaint to be false and established no legal basis for continued freezing. The court directed the investigating officer to release the frozen amount within 10 days with proper documentation and security measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts