BANK OF BARODA vs VIPULKUMAR RAMESH CHANDRA MISTRY — 857/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH090062032025
Filing Number
857/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
857/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANK OF BARODA
Adv. D M DESAI
Respondent(s)
VIPULKUMAR RAMESH CHANDRA MISTRY
Mrs BINA BIMALBHAI MISTRY
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 06-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take physical possession of a mortgaged residential property (Flat No. 406, 62.71 Sq. Mtrs.) in Ahmedabad from borrowers Vipulkumar Mistry and Bina Mistry who defaulted on a ₹8,10,000 housing loan. The court found the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including prior demand notice and NPA classification, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance and court-authorized force if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take physical possession of a mortgaged residential property (Flat No. 406, 62.71 Sq. Mtrs.) in Ahmedabad from borrowers Vipulkumar Mistry and Bina Mistry who defaulted on a ₹8,10,000 housing loan. The court found the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including prior demand notice and NPA classification, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance and court-authorized force if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts