THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NARESHBHAI DHARMSHIBHAI THAKOR — 3791/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090054472025
Filing Number
3791/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
3791/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
2-2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192003240258
Police Station
Sanand GIDC Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARESHBHAI DHARMSHIBHAI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused Nareshbhai Dharamsihai Thakore of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for alleged illegal possession and sale of Indian-made liquor (IMFL). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses (panchas) could not corroborate the seizure details, and critical evidence regarding the seized liquor's authenticity lacked independent verification as required under procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Jan-2026
Plea
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3791/2025
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused Nareshbhai Dharamsihai Thakore of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for alleged illegal possession and sale of Indian-made liquor (IMFL). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses (panchas) could not corroborate the seizure details, and critical evidence regarding the seized liquor's authenticity lacked independent verification as required under procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts