THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GANAPATBHAI BABUBHAI KO.PATEL — 3750/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090053492025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3750/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

3750/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192003220319

Police Station

Sanand GIDC Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

GANAPATBHAI BABUBHAI KO.PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted Ganpatbhai Babubhai Koli Patel under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and IPC Section 185, but imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment and fines rather than the maximum prescribed punishment. The court considered the accused's impoverished background, family circumstances, lack of prior criminal history, and promise of future good conduct as mitigating factors warranting reduced sentencing, citing established judicial precedent that permits courts to impose lighter sentences when substantial and special reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted Ganpatbhai Babubhai Koli Patel under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and IPC Section 185, but imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment and fines rather than the maximum prescribed punishment. The court considered the accused's impoverished background, family circumstances, lack of prior criminal history, and promise of future good conduct as mitigating factors warranting reduced sentencing, citing established judicial precedent that permits courts to impose lighter sentences when substantial and special reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case