THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI URFE ARJUN DASARATHBHAI CHUNARA — 3694/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090052582025
Filing Number
3694/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
3694/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015250930
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AJAYBHAI URFE ARJUN DASARATHBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Ajaybhai Udde Asarubhai Chunara from Changodar, Ahmedabad) in Criminal Case No. 3694/2025 under IPC Section 45(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution witnesses' testimony lacked credibility and independent corroboration, and no reliable documentary evidence supported the case. The accused's acquittal was ordered under CrPC Section 353(6) due to weak prosecution evidence and procedural gaps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Ajaybhai Udde Asarubhai Chunara from Changodar, Ahmedabad) in Criminal Case No. 3694/2025 under IPC Section 45(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution witnesses' testimony lacked credibility and independent corroboration, and no reliable documentary evidence supported the case. The accused's acquittal was ordered under CrPC Section 353(6) due to weak prosecution evidence and procedural gaps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts