THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHWINBHIA ROHITBHAI CHUNARA — 3661/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090052172025
Filing Number
3661/2025
Filing Date
15-11-2025
Registration No
3661/2025
Registration Date
15-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251160
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHWINBHIA ROHITBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 3661/2025 (Sanathand Magisterial Court, Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ashwini Rohit Khinara) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) on the ground that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. No independent corroborating evidence was presented against the accused, and the witnesses' testimonies were insufficient to prove the alleged offense. The court found critical procedural gaps, including lack of proper cross-examination and missing documentary evidence, making conviction unjustifiable under criminal law principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 3661/2025 (Sanathand Magisterial Court, Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ashwini Rohit Khinara) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) on the ground that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. No independent corroborating evidence was presented against the accused, and the witnesses' testimonies were insufficient to prove the alleged offense. The court found critical procedural gaps, including lack of proper cross-examination and missing documentary evidence, making conviction unjustifiable under criminal law principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts