THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DHAVALBHAI URFE SUNNY MUKESHBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 3622/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090051602025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3622/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

3622/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192050250667

Police Station

SANAND POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DHAVALBHAI URFE SUNNY MUKESHBHAI DEVIPUJAK

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision - C.C. No. 3622/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Bhavlabhai Mukheshabhai Devipujak, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness testimony or corroborating evidence was presented on record. The court found that while the case proceeded in the accused's absence under CrPC Section 299, the evidence gathered was inadequate to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision - C.C. No. 3622/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Bhavlabhai Mukheshabhai Devipujak, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness testimony or corroborating evidence was presented on record. The court found that while the case proceeded in the accused's absence under CrPC Section 299, the evidence gathered was inadequate to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case