THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KOKILABEN RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI CHUNARA — 3617/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090051552025
Filing Number
3617/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2025
Registration No
3617/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192050250549
Police Station
SANAND POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KOKILABEN RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In this Sanad, Ahmedabad criminal case (C.C. No. 3617/2025), the court acquitted the accused, Kokilaben Rameshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused, and no independent witnesses supported the allegations. Despite the accused's absence (the case proceeded under CrPC Section 299), the court determined that the evidence on record was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Sanad, Ahmedabad criminal case (C.C. No. 3617/2025), the court acquitted the accused, Kokilaben Rameshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused, and no independent witnesses supported the allegations. Despite the accused's absence (the case proceeded under CrPC Section 299), the court determined that the evidence on record was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts