THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PINKUBEN GAUTAMBHAI CHUNARA — 3587/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090051022025
Filing Number
3587/2025
Filing Date
06-11-2025
Registration No
3587/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015250653
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PINKUBEN GAUTAMBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: C.C.No. 3587/2025 (Gujarat Magistrate Court) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Pinkuben Goutamabai Chunara of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Section 65(a)(a)) for illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchas (official witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations and the investigation procedure appeared defective and tainted. The absence of credible supporting evidence and contradictions in witness statements led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: C.C.No. 3587/2025 (Gujarat Magistrate Court) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Pinkuben Goutamabai Chunara of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Section 65(a)(a)) for illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchas (official witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's allegations and the investigation procedure appeared defective and tainted. The absence of credible supporting evidence and contradictions in witness statements led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts