THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs Maheshbhai Jerambhai Dantani Advocate - S G VANIA — 3366/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(a),125(b),324(4). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090046812025
Filing Number
3366/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
3366/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192003250091
Police Station
Sanand GIDC Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
Maheshbhai Jerambhai Dantani Advocate - S G VANIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary In case C.C.3366/2025, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sanad acquitted the accused Maheshbhai Jeramabhai Dantagni (Devipujak) of charges under IPC sections 279, 336, 337, and 338 read with Section 177 and 184 of the MV Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of the offense, as the witnesses' testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked credibility. The accused was granted bail and released accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary In case C.C.3366/2025, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sanad acquitted the accused Maheshbhai Jeramabhai Dantagni (Devipujak) of charges under IPC sections 279, 336, 337, and 338 read with Section 177 and 184 of the MV Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of the offense, as the witnesses' testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked credibility. The accused was granted bail and released accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts