THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NARESHBHAI DHAMABHAI THAKOR — 3277/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090045632025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3277/2025

Filing Date

18-09-2025

Registration No

3277/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192003240321

Police Station

Sanand GIDC Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

NARESHBHAI DHAMABHAI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused Nareshbhai Dhamabaai Thakor of illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite police seizure claims. The prosecution failed to establish a credible chain of custody or corroborate the seized liquor's authenticity through independent witnesses, leading the judge to rule that without substantive evidence supporting the allegations, the accused cannot be convicted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Nareshbhai Dhamabaai Thakor of illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite police seizure claims. The prosecution failed to establish a credible chain of custody or corroborate the seized liquor's authenticity through independent witnesses, leading the judge to rule that without substantive evidence supporting the allegations, the accused cannot be convicted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case