THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARULBEN NAGARJI THAKOR — 3272/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090045582025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3272/2025

Filing Date

18-09-2025

Registration No

3272/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192003240331

Police Station

Sanand GIDC Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

PARULBEN NAGARJI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Parul Baig Nazarji, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the witnesses (panchas) who testified could not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband alcohol, and their testimonies lacked credibility. The court held that mere police evidence without independent substantiation was insufficient to prove the case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Parul Baig Nazarji, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the witnesses (panchas) who testified could not corroborate the seizure of the alleged contraband alcohol, and their testimonies lacked credibility. The court held that mere police evidence without independent substantiation was insufficient to prove the case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case