DHAVAL MANUBHAI JADAV vs HARJIBHAI GANGARAM Advocate - EX PARTY — 50/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH090014982025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
09-May-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
09-May-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHAVAL MANUBHAI JADAV
Adv. J K CHOKSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARJIBHAI GANGARAM Advocate - EX PARTY
-
2.MANSUKHBHAI GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
-
3.SHAKRIBEN GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
-
4.KANIBEN WIFE OF GANGARAM SAGARBHAI KO PATEL
Adv. EX PARTY
-
5.LABHUBEN GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
-
6.BALDEVBHAI RUPSANG
Adv. EX PARTY
-
7.LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE KRUSHNA RUPSANG(Legal Heir)
Adv. EX PARTY
-
8.BHAYRAMBHAI ALIAS BHAILALBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
-
9.GANIBEN ALIAS JENIBEN DHARSHIBHAI WIFE OF VISHNUBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. EX PARTY
-
10.GHANSHYAMBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
-
11.MINOR SAMIRBHAI BHARATBHAI HIS PARENT GHANSHYAMBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
-
12.AADISH MAHAVIRPRASAD JAIN
Adv. EX PARTY
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Issues
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Issues
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
02-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural land in Ahmedabad pending a specific performance suit based on an alleged oral agreement to sell. Although the court found a triable case existed with some risk of alienation, it held that the cumulative ingredients for granting temporary injunction were not satisfied, citing the oral and conditional nature of the alleged agreement, absence of written contract for the main transaction, lack of possession or part performance by plaintiff, and the adequate protection afforded by the doctrine of lis pendens under the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Feb-2026
Issues
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
24-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
29-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
04-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
26-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
16-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
14-Aug-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
05-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
10-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2025
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural land in Ahmedabad pending a specific performance suit based on an alleged oral agreement to sell. Although the court found a triable case existed with some risk of alienation, it held that the cumulative ingredients for granting temporary injunction were not satisfied, citing the oral and conditional nature of the alleged agreement, absence of written contract for the main transaction, lack of possession or part performance by plaintiff, and the adequate protection afforded by the doctrine of lis pendens under the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts