DHAVAL MANUBHAI JADAV vs HARJIBHAI GANGARAM Advocate - EX PARTY — 50/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH090014982025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHAVAL MANUBHAI JADAV
Adv. J K CHOKSHI
Respondent(s)
HARJIBHAI GANGARAM Advocate - EX PARTY
MANSUKHBHAI GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
SHAKRIBEN GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
KANIBEN WIFE OF GANGARAM SAGARBHAI KO PATEL
Adv. EX PARTY
LABHUBEN GANGARAM
Adv. EX PARTY
BALDEVBHAI RUPSANG
Adv. EX PARTY
LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE KRUSHNA RUPSANG(Legal Heir)
Adv. EX PARTY
BHAYRAMBHAI ALIAS BHAILALBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
GANIBEN ALIAS JENIBEN DHARSHIBHAI WIFE OF VISHNUBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. EX PARTY
GHANSHYAMBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
MINOR SAMIRBHAI BHARATBHAI HIS PARENT GHANSHYAMBHAI DHARSHIBHAI
Adv. EX PARTY
AADISH MAHAVIRPRASAD JAIN
Adv. EX PARTY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 11-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 02-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 03-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 24-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural land in Ahmedabad pending a specific performance suit based on an alleged oral agreement to sell. Although the court found a triable case existed with some risk of alienation, it held that the cumulative ingredients for granting temporary injunction were not satisfied, citing the oral and conditional nature of the alleged agreement, absence of written contract for the main transaction, lack of possession or part performance by plaintiff, and the adequate protection afforded by the doctrine of lis pendens under the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural land in Ahmedabad pending a specific performance suit based on an alleged oral agreement to sell. Although the court found a triable case existed with some risk of alienation, it held that the cumulative ingredients for granting temporary injunction were not satisfied, citing the oral and conditional nature of the alleged agreement, absence of written contract for the main transaction, lack of possession or part performance by plaintiff, and the adequate protection afforded by the doctrine of lis pendens under the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts